veterinary surgery guidelines
The study should be designed to meet the objectives and propose valid conclusions that directly relate to the objectives. Those who do not meet all four criteria should be acknowledged but not listed as co-authors. COVID update: Veterinary Vision has updated their hours and services. Authors are required to certify that the study submitted was conducted in a manner consistent with the U.S. National Institutes of Health “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” (https://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/guide-for-the-care-and-use-of-laboratory-animals.pdf), the Animal Welfare Acts (US PL 89-544;91-579;94-279), and the Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Agricultural Research and Teaching (https://www.asas.org/docs/default-source/default-document-library/ag_guide_3rded.pdf?sfvrsn=4), including appropriate methods of euthanasia (following American Veterinary Medical Association Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals: https://www.avma.org/resources-tools/avma-policies/avma-guidelines-euthanasia-animals). In general, case reports describing observations in a single or a few animals (short case series) will not be considered unless the report makes a substantial contribution to veterinary surgical knowledge and is not merely additive to the existing literature. Veterinary Surgery encourages the submission of hypothesis-driven projects but recognizes that this format may not be applicable to all studies. Examples of English editing services are listed at https://wileyeditingservices.com/en/, or http://www.biosciencewriters.com/. The criteria are not intended for use as a means to disqualify colleagues from authorship who otherwise meet authorship criteria by denying them the opportunity to meet criterion #s 2 or 3. The reader should be able to appreciate the general adequacy of the scientific method used to address the objectives. Validation of these guidelines is necessary to ensure quality and implementability. Authors with limited experience in scientific writing in English are encouraged to seek assistance from professional editing services. are downstairs. Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery Guidelines. Enter your email address below and we will send you your username, If the address matches an existing account you will receive an email with instructions to retrieve your username, By continuing to browse this site, you agree to its use of cookies as described in our, 2. Each key point is developed in an individual paragraph, contrasting results of the study with previous literature and discussing how limitations may impact the validity of each conclusion. If you do not receive an email within 10 minutes, your email address may not be registered, Images and illustrations will be uploaded separately during the submission process. Authors with limited experience in scientific writing in English are encouraged to seek assistance from professional editing services. Any errors not detected or corrected on the galley proof will require publication of an erratum. These articles may be submitted for inclusion in regular issues of the journal. July 2011; 50 (4): 466-470. Anyone providing dental services other than a licensed veterinarian, or a directly supervised (as defined by 256 CMR 2.01) and trained veterinary technician, is practicing veterinary medicine without a license and can be subject to fines and/or criminal charges. Two copies of the manuscript in Microsoft Word format are required: one complete version with a title page and one blinded manuscript (redacted) without a title page or any identifying information (eg, authors’ names, initials, or institutions) within the body of the manuscript, and electronic copies of any illustrations. For example, sections related to the significance of a condition or background knowledge about the topic should be unique to each publication. Manuscripts exceeding 6,000 words, poorly prepared or poorly written will be returned without peer review. In general, case reports describing observations in a single or a few animals (short case series, including less than 10 animals) will not be considered unless the report makes a substantial contribution to veterinary surgical knowledge and is not merely additive to the existing literature. Review articles are evaluated with a specific rubric, available in the section on Peer Review. Manuscripts reporting original clinical, research or retrospective studies are evaluated by experts using a specific rubric, available in the section on Peer Review. Veterinary Surgery is a member of CrossCheck, a service offered by CrossRef and powered by iThenticate software. Early View (Online publication before Print) – After the galley proof has been corrected, the manuscript will published online in advance of print publication.